New Izyaslav. Panorama of Izyaslav (city). Virtual tour of Izyaslav (city). Attractions, map, photos, videos What happened in the city of Izyaslav

The distance to Khmelnitsky by railway is 146 km, by road - 103 km.

Geography

History of Izyaslav

Ancient Izyaslav was located on the eastern border of the Volyn land between the Goryn and Sluch rivers. The city was founded as a guard on the Kiev-Volyn border in the first half of the 12th century by the Volyn prince Izyaslav Mstislavich, who ruled here in 1135-1142.

In the 15th-16th centuries, the city was attacked by Tatars every 10-20 years. In particular, there is evidence of attacks by Tatar troops in 1491, 1534 and 1577. In 1491, near Izyaslavl, a battle took place between the Tatars and an army led by the Marshal of Volyn, the governor of Novogrudok, and a year later by the Great Hetman of Lithuania, Semyon Golshansky and the Lviv castellan Nikolai from Gorodets.

Another notable battle at Izyaslav took place in 1534 between the Tatars and the Cossacks of Wenceslaus Khmelnytsky, who, by order of the Polish king Sigismund I, was sent to block the road to a detachment of Crimean Tatars breaking through from Crimea through Bessarabia.

The troops who broke through the enemy’s defenses and liberated Izyaslav and other cities were thanked by order of the Supreme Command Headquarters on March 5, 1944, and a salute was given in Moscow with 20 artillery salvoes from 224 guns.

• 59th engineer brigade (Colonel Serebryakov, Boris Petrovich)
• 1076th Army Fighter Anti-Tank Artillery Regiment (Lieutenant Colonel Kalinin, Fedor Alexandrovich)
• 58th separate division of armored trains (Major Marijanov, Ivan Sergeevich)
• 752nd Fighter Anti-Tank Artillery Division (Captain Piskun, Ivan Yakovlevich)
• 379th separate communications battalion (Major Blushtein, Lazar Khonovich).

By decree of the Presidium of the USSR Armed Forces dated March 19, 1944, for the exemplary fulfillment of command assignments in the battles for the liberation of the cities of Starokonstantinov, Izyaslavl, Shumsk, Yampol, Ostropol and the valor and courage displayed at the same time, the 23rd Guards Motorized Rifle Vasilkovskaya Brigade was awarded the Order of the Red Banner.

Industry

More than ten large enterprises operate in the city. Among them are a bakery, a forestry enterprise, a creamery, a feed mill, Bartnik LLC (main activity: procurement and processing of beekeeping products, export), a garment factory, and a meat processing plant. In the first half of 2008, industrial output amounted to 22.9 million hryvnia. The estimated growth rate is 124.29%. On the basis of the Kharchomash plant, which has not been operating for a long time, it is planned to organize a cardboard and paper factory.

Attractions

The cells of the monastery were built in 1606-1610 by the architect J. Madelena, rebuilt in 1727. The cells are brick, two-story, on the eastern facade there is a risalit formed by a refectory. In the center of the eastern facade there is a high baroque pediment, decorated with niches and volutes. Architecturally interesting is the single-tier vestibule in front of the western entrance with a magnificent Baroque pediment.

The ruins of the castle (1539) are actually a building located on the territory of the castle, where the princely property was kept. During excavations, the remains of houses from the 12th-13th centuries and castle walls were discovered here. The building is two-story, with basements made of wild stone; the masonry contains processed white stone blocks - apparently from earlier buildings. Second floor and brick tower. The basement and floors are connected by intra-wall channels for lifts.

The Church of John the Baptist (Farny) (1599) was built by the architect J. Madelena by order of Prince Ivan Zaslavsky, destroyed by the Cossacks of Bohdan Khmelnytsky, rebuilt in 1756 by the architect P. A. Fontana. It was the tomb of the princes Zaslavsky and Sangushko. Built of stone and brick: a six-pillar basilica with a tower at the front and a faceted apse in the east. Under the altar there is a crypt. There are two key-shaped loopholes on the gable of the northern risalit. The architecture of the church is a good example of a combination of Gothic and Renaissance elements.

On the territory of a 15th century castle. there is an 18th century manor house. Built by P. A. Fontana in the Baroque style. This is a palace with an arcade-gallery and an outbuilding adjacent to it, a bridge, and a church. From the 18th century manor palace, only ruins remain. The palace was rebuilt in the 1870s. It is brick, two-story, with attics. The lower floor is divided into two equal halves by a corridor. There is a central oval hall with wide flights of stairs along the walls. Manor Church of St. Joseph (1750-1760) was built by P. A. Fontana, it is a brick six-pillar treznave basilica with a rectangular altar part. On the sides of the main façade there are three-tier bell towers connected to the main part by passages.

Gallery

Izyaslav Central square.jpg

central square

view of the monastery of the Order of Saint Bernard

Error creating thumbnail: File not found

central Street

Error creating thumbnail: File not found

Shevchenko Street (Maidan)

A viev in New Zaslav.JPG

City view

The city in old drawings and photographs

Zaslav zamok old.png

old lock

Church of St. Ivan the Baptist. Zaslav.jpg

Church of St. John the Baptist

The Big synagogue in Zaslav.jpg

Synagogue

Old zaslav 1910.jpeg

Pitchforks of the City

Old zaslav postcard.png

Old Izyaslavl

Kostiol of St. Joseph Zaslav postivka.jpg

Church of St. Joseph

St Michael`s church Zaslav.jpeg

Church of St. Michael the Archangel

Zaslav on Volin. Delivery. 1910.jpg

Izyaslavl in Volyn. post card

Zaslav.Palace of Sanushki in the park.png

Sanggushko Palace

Monastir Bernardin Zaslav.png

Bernardine monastery

Write a review about the article "Izyaslav (city)"

Notes

1. Peskova A. A. Ancient Izyaslavl // KSIA. - M., 1981. Issue. 164
3. Karger M.K. The ancient Russian city of Izyaslavl in the light of archaeological research 1957-1964 // Abstracts of reports of the Soviet delegation at the I International Congress of Slavic Archeology in Warsaw. - M., 1965
4. Kotlyar N. F. Formation of territory and the emergence of cities of Galician-Volyn Rus in the 9th-13th centuries. - Kyiv, 1985
5. Archiwum książąt Lubartowiczów-Sanguszków w Sławucie / wyd. B. Gorczak. - Lwów, 1890. - T. 1. - S. 62; Polski Słownik Biograficzny. - Wrocław, 1979. - T. 24. - S. 497; Słownik Geograficzny królestwa polskiego i innych ziem słowiańskich. - Warszawa, 1895. - T. 14. - S. 445.
7. Bogdan Khmelnitsky, a chronicle of the Jewish contemporary Nathan Hanover, about the events of 1648-1652 in Little Russia in general and about the fate of his co-religionists in particular. - Odessa, 1878. - pp. 62-63.
8. Archiwum państwowe w Krakowie. - Archiwum Sanguszków, Rękopisy. - No. 62. S. 10.
9. Baranovich Zalyudnennaya Ukraine... - P.114-140.
11. Minkov I., Stetsyuk V. Izyaslav. Historical and local history drawing. Materials for lectures and conversations up to 1000 places. Khmelnitsky regional organization of the partnership “Knowledge”. Manuscript. − P. 22.
12. Pykhalov I. The Great Slandered War. - M.: Yauza, Eksmo, 2005. - 480 p. Chapter 3. “The Myth of the Cavalry.”
13. Red Banner Kyiv. Essays on the history of the Red Banner Kyiv Military District (1919-1979). Second edition, corrected and expanded. Kyiv, publishing house of political literature of Ukraine, 1979. pp. 81-112. Ch. 6. On a new basis.
18. Liberation of cities. - M.: Military Publishing House, 1985.
19. / M. L. Dudarenko, Yu. G. Perechnev, V. T. Eliseev, etc. M.: Voenizdat, 1985. 598 p.
20. Isaev A.V. From Dubno to Rostov. - M.: AST; Transitbook, 2004.
21. Website Soldat.ru.
25. Skrabski J. Paolo Fontana. Nadworny architekt Sanguszkόw.― Tarnόw, 2007. ISBN 978-83-85988-77-9 Polish
26. Monuments of urban planning and architecture of the Ukrainian SSR. T. 4. - Kyiv, 1986. P. 204-206

Literature

• Kovalenko L. A. Izyaslav: Historical drawing. - Lviv: Kamenyar, 1966. - 27 p.
• Minkov I. I. Izyaslav - a place for old times: Historical and local history documentary drawing. - Shepetivka, 2000.
• Vermenich Ya. V. Izyaslav // Encyclopedia of Ukrainian History. - T. 3. - Kiev, 2005. - P. 429-430.
• Minkov I. I., Stetsyuk V.V. Izyaslavl Region: nature - history - people. - Kiev: Steel, 2008
• Red Banner Kyiv. Essays on the history of the Red Banner Kyiv Military District (1919-1979). Second edition, corrected and expanded. Kyiv, publishing house of political literature of Ukraine, 1979.

Links

• (Ukrainian)
• (Ukrainian)
• (Ukrainian)

Excerpt characterizing Izyaslav (city)

The next day, Prince Andrei went on visits to some houses where he had not yet been, including the Rostovs, with whom he renewed his acquaintance at the last ball. In addition to the laws of politeness, according to which he needed to be with the Rostovs, Prince Andrei wanted to see at home this special, lively girl, who left him with a pleasant memory.
Natasha was one of the first to meet him. She was wearing a blue home dress, in which she seemed even better to Prince Andrei than in the ball gown. She and the entire Rostov family received Prince Andrei as an old friend, simply and cordially. The entire family, which Prince Andrei had previously judged strictly, now seemed to him to be made up of wonderful, simple and kind people. The hospitality and good nature of the old count, which was especially striking in St. Petersburg, was such that Prince Andrei could not refuse dinner. “Yes, these are kind, nice people,” thought Bolkonsky, who, of course, don’t understand one bit the treasure they have in Natasha; but good people who make up the best background for this especially poetic, full of life, lovely girl to stand out against!”
Prince Andrei felt in Natasha the presence of a completely alien to him, special world, filled with some unknown joys, that alien world that even then, in the Otradnensky alley and on the window, on a moonlit night, teased him so much. Now this world no longer teased him, it was no longer an alien world; but he himself, having entered it, found in it a new pleasure for himself.
After dinner, Natasha, at the request of Prince Andrei, went to the clavichord and began to sing. Prince Andrei stood at the window, talking with the ladies, and listened to her. In the middle of the sentence, Prince Andrei fell silent and suddenly felt tears coming to his throat, the possibility of which he did not know was within himself. He looked at Natasha singing, and something new and happy happened in his soul. He was happy and at the same time he was sad. He had absolutely nothing to cry about, but he was ready to cry. About what? About former love? About the little princess? About your disappointments?... About your hopes for the future?... Yes and no. The main thing that he wanted to cry about was the terrible opposition he suddenly vividly realized between something infinitely great and indefinable that was in him, and something narrow and corporeal that he himself was and even she was. This opposite tormented and delighted him while she sang.
As soon as Natasha finished singing, she came up to him and asked him how he liked her voice? She asked this and became embarrassed after she said it, realizing that she should not have asked this. He smiled looking at her and said that he liked her singing as much as anything she did.
Prince Andrei left the Rostovs late in the evening. He went to bed out of habit, but soon saw that he could not sleep. He lit a candle and sat in bed, then got up, then lay down again, not at all burdened by insomnia: his soul was so joyful and new, as if he had stepped out of a stuffy room into the free light of God. It never occurred to him that he was in love with Rostova; he didn't think about her; he only imagined her, and as a result his whole life seemed to him in a new light. “What am I fighting for, why am I fussing in this narrow, closed frame, when life, all life with all its joys, is open to me?” he said to himself. And for the first time after a long time, he began to make happy plans for the future. He decided on his own that he needed to start raising his son, finding him a teacher and entrusting him with it; then you have to retire and go abroad, see England, Switzerland, Italy. “I need to use my freedom while I feel so much strength and youth in myself,” he said to himself. Pierre was right when he said that you have to believe in the possibility of happiness in order to be happy, and now I believe in him. Let’s leave the dead to bury the dead, but while you’re alive, you must live and be happy,” he thought.

One morning, Colonel Adolf Berg, whom Pierre knew, as he knew everyone in Moscow and St. Petersburg, in a spick-and-span uniform, with his temples smeared in front, as Emperor Alexander Pavlovich wore, came to see him.
“I was just now with the Countess, your wife, and was so unhappy that my request could not be fulfilled; I hope that with you, Count, I will be happier,” he said, smiling.
-What do you want, Colonel? I am at your service.
“Now, Count, I’m completely settled in my new apartment,” Berg said, obviously knowing that it could not but be pleasant to hear this; - and that’s why I wanted to do this, a little evening for my friends and my wife’s acquaintances. (He smiled even more pleasantly.) I wanted to ask the Countess and you to do me the honor of inviting us for a cup of tea and... dinner.
“Only Countess Elena Vasilyevna, considering the company of some Bergs humiliating for herself, could have the cruelty to refuse such an invitation. - Berg explained so clearly why he wants to gather a small and good society, and why it will be pleasant for him, and why he spares money for cards and for something bad, but for a good society he is ready to incur expenses that Pierre could not refuse and promised to be.
- But it’s not too late, Count, if I dare to ask, then at 10 minutes to eight, I dare to ask. We will form a party, our general will be. He is very kind to me. Let's have dinner, Count. So do me a favor.
Contrary to his habit of being late, Pierre that day, instead of eight minutes to ten minutes, arrived at the Bergs at eight hours to a quarter.
The Bergs, having stocked up what they needed for the evening, were already ready to receive guests.
In a new, clean, bright office, decorated with busts and pictures and new furniture, Berg sat with his wife. Berg, in a brand new, buttoned uniform, sat next to his wife, explaining to her that it is always possible and should have acquaintances with people who are higher than oneself, because only then can there be a pleasure from making acquaintances. - “If you take something, you can ask for something. Look how I lived from the first ranks (Berg considered his life not as years, but as the highest awards). My comrades are now nothing yet, and I am in the vacancy of a regimental commander, I have the happiness of being your husband (he stood up and kissed Vera’s hand, but on the way to her he turned back the corner of the rolled-up carpet). And how did I acquire all this? The main thing is the ability to choose your acquaintances. It goes without saying that one must be virtuous and careful.”
Berg smiled with the consciousness of his superiority over a weak woman and fell silent, thinking that after all this sweet wife of his was a weak woman who could not comprehend everything that constitutes the dignity of a man - ein Mann zu sein [to be a man]. Vera at the same time also smiled with the consciousness of her superiority over a virtuous, good husband, but who still erroneously, like all men, according to Vera’s concept, understood life. Berg, judging by his wife, considered all women weak and stupid. Vera, judging by her husband alone and spreading this remark, believed that all men attribute intelligence only to themselves, and at the same time they do not understand anything, are proud and selfish.
Berg stood up and, hugging his wife carefully so as not to wrinkle the lace cape for which he had paid dearly, kissed her in the middle of her lips.
“The only thing is that we don’t have children so soon,” he said, out of an unconscious filiation of ideas.
“Yes,” Vera answered, “I don’t want that at all.” We must live for society.
“This is exactly what Princess Yusupova was wearing,” said Berg, with a happy and kind smile, pointing to the cape.
At this time, the arrival of Count Bezukhy was reported. Both spouses looked at each other with a smug smile, each taking credit for the honor of this visit.
“This is what it means to be able to make acquaintances,” thought Berg, this is what it means to be able to hold oneself!
“Just please, when I am entertaining guests,” said Vera, “don’t interrupt me, because I know what to do with everyone, and in what society what should be said.”
Berg smiled too.
“You can’t: sometimes you have to have a man’s conversation with men,” he said.
Pierre was received in a brand new living room, in which it was impossible to sit anywhere without violating the symmetry, cleanliness and order, and therefore it was quite understandable and not strange that Berg generously offered to destroy the symmetry of an armchair or sofa for a dear guest, and apparently being in In this regard, in painful indecision, he proposed a solution to this issue to the choice of the guest. Pierre upset the symmetry by pulling up a chair for himself, and immediately Berg and Vera began the evening, interrupting each other and keeping the guest busy.
Vera, having decided in her mind that Pierre should be occupied with a conversation about the French embassy, ​​immediately began this conversation. Berg, deciding that a man's conversation was also necessary, interrupted his wife's speech, touching on the question of the war with Austria and involuntarily jumped from the general conversation into personal considerations about the proposals that were made to him to participate in the Austrian campaign, and about the reasons why he didn't accept them. Despite the fact that the conversation was very awkward, and that Vera was angry for the interference of the male element, both spouses felt with pleasure that, despite the fact that there was only one guest, the evening had started very well, and that the evening was like two drops of water is like any other evening with conversations, tea and lit candles.
Soon Boris, Berg's old friend, arrived. He treated Berg and Vera with a certain shade of superiority and patronage. The lady and the colonel came for Boris, then the general himself, then the Rostovs, and the evening was absolutely, undoubtedly, like all evenings. Berg and Vera could not hold back a joyful smile at the sight of this movement around the living room, at the sound of this incoherent talking, the rustling of dresses and bows. Everything was like everyone else, the general was especially similar, praising the apartment, patting Berg on the shoulder, and with paternal arbitrariness he ordered the setting up of the Boston table. The general sat down next to Count Ilya Andreich, as if he were the most distinguished of the guests after himself. Old people with old people, young people with young people, the hostess at the tea table, on which there were exactly the same cookies in a silver basket that the Panins had at the evening, everything was exactly the same as the others.

Pierre, as one of the most honored guests, was to sit in Boston with Ilya Andreich, the general and colonel. Pierre had to sit opposite Natasha at the Boston table, and the strange change that had occurred in her since the day of the ball amazed him. Natasha was silent, and not only was she not as good-looking as she was at the ball, but she would have been bad if she had not looked so meek and indifferent to everything.
"What with her?" thought Pierre, looking at her. She sat next to her sister at the tea table and reluctantly, without looking at him, answered something to Boris, who sat down next to her. Having walked away the whole suit and taken five bribes to the satisfaction of his partner, Pierre, who heard the chatter of greetings and the sound of someone’s steps entering the room while collecting bribes, looked at her again.
“What happened to her?” he said to himself even more surprised.
Prince Andrei stood in front of her with a thrifty, tender expression and told her something. She, raising her head, flushed and apparently trying to control her gusty breathing, looked at him. And the bright light of some inner, previously extinguished fire burned in her again. She was completely transformed. From being bad she again became the same as she was at the ball.
Prince Andrei approached Pierre and Pierre noticed a new, youthful expression on his friend’s face.
Pierre changed seats several times during the game, now with his back, now facing Natasha, and throughout the entire 6 Roberts made observations of her and his friend.
“Something very important is happening between them,” thought Pierre, and the joyful and at the same time bitter feeling made him worry and forget about the game.
After 6 Roberts, the general stood up, saying that it was impossible to play like that, and Pierre received his freedom. Natasha was talking to Sonya and Boris on one side, Vera was talking about something with a subtle smile to Prince Andrei. Pierre went up to his friend and, asking if what was being said was a secret, sat down next to them. Vera, noticing Prince Andrei's attention to Natasha, found that at an evening, at a real evening, it was necessary that there be subtle hints of feelings, and seizing the time when Prince Andrei was alone, she began a conversation with him about feelings in general and about her sister . With such an intelligent guest (as she considered Prince Andrei) she needed to apply her diplomatic skills to the matter.
When Pierre approached them, he noticed that Vera was in a smug rapture of conversation, Prince Andrei (which rarely happened to him) seemed embarrassed.
– What do you think? – Vera said with a subtle smile. “You, prince, are so insightful and so immediately understand the character of people.” What do you think about Natalie, can she be constant in her affections, can she, like other women (Vera meant herself), love a person once and remain faithful to him forever? This is what I consider true love. What do you think, prince?
“I know your sister too little,” answered Prince Andrei with a mocking smile, under which he wanted to hide his embarrassment, “to resolve such a delicate question; and then I noticed that the less I like a woman, the more constant she is,” he added and looked at Pierre, who came up to them at that time.
- Yes, it’s true, prince; in our time,” Vera continued (mentioning our time, as narrow-minded people generally like to mention, believing that they have found and appreciated the features of our time and that the properties of people change over time), in our time a girl has so much freedom that le plaisir d"etre courtisee [the pleasure of having admirers] often drowns out the true feeling in her. Et Nathalie, il faut l"avouer, y est tres sensible. [And Natalya, I must admit, is very sensitive to this.] The return to Natalie again made Prince Andrei frown unpleasantly; he wanted to get up, but Vera continued with an even more refined smile.
“I think no one was courtisee [the object of courtship] like her,” said Vera; - but never, until very recently, did she seriously like anyone. “You know, Count,” she turned to Pierre, “even our dear cousin Boris, who was, entre nous [between us], very, very dans le pays du tendre... [in the land of tenderness...]
Prince Andrei frowned and remained silent.
– You’re friends with Boris, aren’t you? – Vera told him.
- Yes, I know him…
– Did he tell you correctly about his childhood love for Natasha?
– Was there childhood love? - Prince Andrei suddenly asked, blushing unexpectedly.
- Yes. Vous savez entre cousin et cousine cette intimate mene quelquefois a l"amour: le cousinage est un dangereux voisinage, N"est ce pas? [You know, between a cousin and sister, this closeness sometimes leads to love. Such kinship is a dangerous neighborhood. Is not it?]

Izyaslav(Ukrainian Izyaslav) is a city in Ukraine, the center of the Izyaslavsky district of the Khmelnitsky region.

Population - 18,322 people. The distance to Khmelnitsky by train is 146 km, by road - 103 km.

Magdeburg Law - 1583, updated in 1754.

Geography

The city is located on the Goryn River. Railway station on the “Shepetivka-Podilskaya-Ternopil” lane.

History of Izyaslav

According to one of the historical versions, Prince Vladimir in the 10th century allocated an inheritance here to his son Izyaslav, according to another, the city was founded by Prince Izyaslav Mstislavovich in the 13th century[ source not specified 658 days] . At the end of the 13th century, Izyaslav became part of the Galicia-Volyn principality. In the 14th century the city became the property of the Ostrog princes. Their right to Izyaslav is confirmed by a charter from the Polish king Vladislav Jagiello. In 1448, the city came into the possession of the son of Prince Ostrog - Yuri. Yuri became the founder of the family of princes Zaslavsky.

In the 15th-16th centuries, every 10-20 years the city was attacked by Tatars. In particular, there is evidence of attacks by Tatar troops in 1491, 1534 and 1577. In the 16th-17th centuries, Izyaslav became a significant economic center; it was compared with Yaroslavl, Lvov and Lublin. In 1613, more than half of the residents of Old Izyaslav were engaged in agriculture. 40% of the townspeople combined service, craft and trade with agriculture. According to the household register of 1629, two thirds of the cities in Volyn had up to 300 houses. In 1629, Old Izyaslav was considered a medium-sized city. New Izyaslav, which was located on the other side of the Goryn River, had 508 farmsteads. In 1648, Bohdan Khmelnytsky stormed Izyaslav Castle.

Later, according to the Andruseevsky Truce, Izyaslav came under Polish control. Some local residents, fleeing the oppression of the Zaslavsky princes, and from 1673 - Sangushko, left for other areas[ source not specified 658 days] . In 1793-1795, after the reunification of the left-bank and right-bank Ukraine as part of the Russian Empire, the city was the center of the Izyaslav governorship, in 1796-1797 - the center of the Volyn governorate, and later - the same province as part of the Russian Federation. At the beginning of the 20th century, the population of Izyaslav only slightly exceeded 10 thousand people. Moreover, a significant difference occurred between 1919 and 23 years: in 1919 - 18 thousand inhabitants, in 1923 - 10 thousand. In 1921-1923, famine began in the Izyaslavsky region, where Russian power had already been established, as a result of the food appropriation program. However, it was less terrible than in the East of Ukraine[ source not specified 658 days] . A stream of refugees poured into the Izyaslavsky region from the eastern regions, and with them speculators.

Industry

There are more than 10 huge companies operating in the city. Among them are bakeries, a forestry enterprise, a feed mill, a clothing factory, and a meat processing plant. For the first half of 2008, industrial output amounted to 22.9 million hryvnia. The estimated growth rate is 124.29%. On the basis of the Kharchomash plant, which has not been operating for a long time, it is planned to organize a cardboard and paper factory.

Gallery

Attractions

• BERNARDINE MONASTERY, early 17th century.
• CASTLE (RUINS), 1539
• JOHN THE BAPTIST CHURCH, 1599
• ESTATE, mid-18th century.

Notes

1. ^ Archiwum ksiazat Lubartowiczow-Sanguszkow w Slawucie / wyd. B. Gorczak. - Lwow, 1890. - T. 1. - S. 62; Polski Slownik Biograficzny. - Wroclaw, 1979. - T. 24. - S. 497; Slownik Geograficzny krolestwa polskiego i innych ziem slowianskich. - Warszawa, 1895. - T. 14. - S. 445.
2. ^ Bogdan Khmelnitsky, a chronicle of the Jewish contemporary Nathan Hanover, about the events of 1648-1652 in Little Russia in general and about the fate of personal co-religionists in originality. - Odessa, 1878. - pp. 62-63.
3. ^ Archiwum panstwowe w Krakowie. - Archiwum Sanguszkow, Rekopisy. - No. 62. S. 10.
4. ^ Baranovich Zalyudnennaya Ukraine... - P.114-140.
5. ^ Minkov I., Stetsyuk V. Izyaslav. Historical and local history drawing. Materials for lectures and conversations up to 1000 places. Khmelnitsky regional organization of the partnership “Knowledge”. Manuscript. P. 22.

Literature

• Zaslavl // Jewish Encyclopedia of Brockhaus and Efron. - St. Petersburg. , 1906-1913.
• Zaslav, district town of Volyn province // Encyclopedic Dictionary of Brockhaus and Efron: In 86 volumes (82 volumes and 4 additional ones). - St. Petersburg. , 1890-1907.
• Kovalenko Liter.. A. Izyaslav: Historical drawing. - Lviv: Kamenyar, 1966. - 27 p.
• Minkov I. I. Izyaslav - a place for old times: Historical and local history documentary drawing. - Shepetivka, 2000.
• Vermenich Ya. V. Izyaslav // Encyclopedia of Ukrainian History. - T. 3. - Kiev, 2005. - P. 429-430.

Minkov I.I., Stetsyuk V.V. Izyaslavl Region: nature - history - people. - Kiev: Steel, 2008

Familiar native

Information about the company IZYASLAVSKA DISTRICT SPILKA VETERAN IN AFGHANISTAN

The city of Izyaslav is considered one of the most depressing in the entire Khmelnitsky region. It certainly didn’t seem prosperous to me, but I didn’t see any extreme poverty there. At the same time, from the point of view of a tourist, Izyaslav, located in the north of the region, 100 km from Khmelnitsky, is of considerable interest. Very little ordinary historical buildings have been preserved here, but there are a number of outstanding sights, albeit often in ruins.

Izyaslav was first mentioned in 1096. However, the current city has no direct relation to the original one. Chronicle Zaslav was located near modern Shepetivka, in the area of ​​​​the village of Gorodishche (where, by the way, there is an interesting monastery with a cathedral in the Vilna Baroque style, a rare thing in Ukraine). Archaeologists excavated that Zaslav, found Detynets and a round town with a triple line of ramparts and ditches, a heap of human bones. It is assumed that on one not so wonderful day in 1241, this city was burned by the Tatars, and about one and a half thousand of its inhabitants died along with it.

After such a misfortune, in the second half of the 13th century, Zaslav was rebuilt, 20 kilometers to the east on the banks of the Goryn River. Over time, it became the personal property of Grand Duke Gediminas, then became part of the Volynian possessions of the Ostrozhskys, and eventually passed to the son of Prince Vasily Fedorovich Ostrogsky, Yuri, who became the founder of a new magnate family, which received the Zaslavsky surname from its main residence. Zaslav (or Zhaslavl, Zhoslav) flourished to such an extent that in the second half of the 16th century the Zaslavskys decided to found another city on the opposite bank of the Goryn. Thus, already in 1579, New Zaslav appeared on the maps:

And they [Yanush and Mikhail Zaslavsky] on the shaggy soil of their Old Zhaslavl, on the other side of the place of Old Zhaslavl, the place of New Zhaslavl, they wanted to lay siege to their belongings, they began to lay siege to their skin,- said the privilege, which in 1583 gave Magdeburg law to Novy Zaslav. Both Zaslavs had a castle, and in Novy the princes of Sangushki, to whom this double city passed after the extinction of the Zaslavskys in 1673, also built a palace. In 1792, the Ukrainian Izyaslavl even became a provincial town, and who knows what its fate would have been, but in 1795 the center of the Izyaslavl province was moved first to Novograd-Volynsky, and then to Zhitomir, and the province itself was renamed Volyn. Izyaslav remained only a district town.

There will be two big episodes about Izyaslav, there is something to see there. We examined it in a not entirely logical order, starting with Novy Zaslav. About him in the first part.

1. We disembarked from the train in Shepetovka. For the convenience of passengers, the bus station was built there at the other end of the city; it’s easier to take a taxi to Izyaslav from the railway station. We entered the city at dusk.

2. Shevchenko Street, one of the two central ones in Novy Zaslav, towards the exit from the city. Somewhere there is an abandoned (or semi-abandoned) military town, but, alas, we did not know about it. Previously, 100,500 Soviet military personnel were stationed in Izyaslav, which was the basis of its prosperity. After the disbandment of units that were not needed by independent Ukraine, Izyaslav began to mope.

3. However, we did see something similar to the pre-war DOS.

4. The pavilion with the name “Beer and Water” that caresses the nostalgic eye. It belongs to the Slavuta brewery (Slavuta is a city between Neteshyn and Shepetovka), which produces an interesting beer “Prince Sangushko”. Before leaving Izyaslav, I specifically ran here again to buy branded goods. The men, melancholy consuming draft Slavuta in the store, advised us to take the brewery’s new variety, “Princess Sangushko”. In general, these regions are simply a reserve for small, independent breweries. They are in Khmelnitsky, and in Berdichev, and in Slavuta. Thanks to this, the collection of corks from drunk beers was significantly enriched during the trip.

5. We went west, to Goryn, along the street. Shevchenko. The first attraction is already visible ahead.

6. Fire station.

7. The monastery of the Lazarite Fathers has been preserved in full: both the church and the residential buildings with which it is built on almost all sides.

8. Monastery complex with the Church of St. Joseph was built for the exotic Lazarite Order on the territory of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania in 1755. The buildings in the late Baroque style were designed by the outstanding architect Paolo Fontana, and the founder was the great Marshal of Lithuania Pavel Karol Sangushko

9. In fact, the church served as a brownie at the nearby Sangushek residence. Now it is still Catholic, but the residential buildings of the monastery are used by a wide variety of institutions: from a children's art school to the editorial office of the newspaper "Zorya Nadgorinnya".

10. Across the street from the complex (on the left) is the abandoned building of the monastery hospital.

11. This is how the Lazarite monastery looked in the watercolor of Napoleon Orda, who arrived here in 1872. On the right is Novozaslavsky Castle.

12. And this is how it looks now from a similar angle.

13. The side church bell towers are decorated not with crosses, but with such elegant crowns with palm branches.

14. Opposite the Lazarite monastery is the complex of the Novozaslavsky castle, the Zaslavsky palace and the Sangushek palace. These are all different structures, ultimately united into a single ensemble.

15. Plan of the complex. A: Sangushko Palace; B: Yard; C: Zaslavsky Palace; D: Old building of the Novozaslavsky castle; E: Local Government Building; F: Church of St. Joseph and the Monastery of the Lazarite Fathers; G: Lazarite Hospital.

16. We enter the territory of the Zaslavsky-Sangushek residence through the so-called. "Yard" (point B on the plan), a rectangular structure in projection, in 1759-64. uniting the newly built Sangushko Palace with the Zaslavsky Palace, surrounded on three sides except the east by galleries, and having monumental gates on the east and west. One of these gates is pictured. To their left is the side facade of the Sangushek Palace.

17. This is the so-called the Zaslavsky Palace, the far right part of which is a fragment of the Novozaslavsky castle, built during the founding of Novy Zaslav in the last quarter of the 16th century on the cape formed by the confluence of the Ponori and the Goryn.

18. And this is the side facade of the Sangushek palace, which did not fit into the residence of their predecessors and started construction of a new one.

19. In 1944, due to shelling by the Soviet army and the fire it caused, the palace complex was significantly damaged. After World War II, the Sangushek Palace was not used; the military converted only the Zaslavsky Palace and the Novozaslavsky Castle into dormitories and warehouses.

20. Church of St. Joseph from the ruins of the palace and castle complex.

21. In the early 1980s, the Soviet military finally stopped using the Zaslavsky Palace. It (pictured) quickly came into line with the neighboring Sangushko Palace.

22. The internal facade of the latter, facing the cape between the rivers.

23. This is how Napoleon Orda saw him in 1872. On the left is the Zaslavsky Palace and the Dvora Gallery, which unites the ensemble. At the right edge of the picture you can see a preserved building of unclear purpose.

24. A killer dog rushes from the Lazarite Church, which accompanied us throughout the entire exploration of this territory.

25. External facade of the Sangushek Palace.

26. Suddenly the sun came out and scared everyone.

27. The benches stand in front of the same building that appeared in the Horde’s drawing, to which two long extensions were made on both sides. Now there are medical institutions here, and the area between it and the Sangushek Palace is used for cultural events.

28. Beautiful drawings on the wall of an outbuilding.

29. They reminded me that we also have our own Izyaslavl.

30. From the territory of the Novozaslavsky castle there are good views of Stary Zaslav, located on the left bank of the Goryn.

31. Goryn is dammed. At the left edge of the photo (to the left of the church) is Starozaslavsky Castle. At the right edge, behind the trees, the complex of the Bernardine monastery is visible.

32. We’ll go to him in the next episode.

33. Nativity Church and the ruins of the Farny Church in Stary Zaslav.

34. Now let's look at Novy Zaslav itself. Self-propelled artillery unit ISU-152, another evidence of Izyaslav’s military past. It stands between the palaces and the monastery.

35. Shevchenko Street near the monastery turns towards the central square of the city, crossing the Ponorya River along the way.

36. Central square and bridge over the river.

37. Restaurant (?) "Goryn".

38. Monument to the victims of the Holodomor.

39. Area. Buildings from left to right: district administration, district council, secondary school.

40. The school has a monument to the founding of the city in 1096. As I already noted, the specified date has nothing to do with this particular place. Even the second Zaslav was not founded here, only the third.

41. Area.

42. View from here of the monastery and palace complex, hidden by trees.

43. School with a giant flagpole.

44. The honor board is in front of her.

46. ​​Izyaslavsky Lenin, very Western for Ukraine.

47. Sketch "Lenin and the District Committee".

48. We walked a little along Independence Street, another central Izyaslav highway.

49. Post office with a mosaic of the Ostankino TV tower.

51. Mysterious stencil.

52. Cafe "Ukrainian".

53. Former cinema, now the regional House of Children and Youth Creativity "Rainbow".

54. Memorial to internationalist soldiers with a bust of Hero of the Soviet Union, Lieutenant Onishchuk, probably a local native.

55. Perspective of Independence Street towards the exit from the city to Shepetovka.

56. Another high school, it looks like it was pre-war.

57. Let's return to the square and go along Grushevsky Street to Stary Zaslav.

58. On the road there is also a Glory Square with a war memorial.

About Stary Zaslav in the next part.

In previous episodes.

Interesting anthropological materials from the times of the Tatar-Mongol invasion. The political-ideological framework is somewhat surprising, immediately casting doubt on the presented materials (however, it can be ignored), as well as the unvaried interpretation of some archaeological artifacts, for example, those widespread in the second millennium AD. so-called cutting.
Original taken from sinn_fein in News of archeology, Eurasianism and a unified history textbook

This is the skull of a Russian warrior, recently found in Vladimir during the opening of a sanitary burial from the time of the Mongol invasion. Three injuries are visible on the skull, two not fatal, the first from an arrow, the second from a saber, and only the last, fatal to the temple from a mace. The warrior, bleeding, fought to the last...

However, the data of the latest archaeological discoveries are unlikely to fall into Putin’s “unified history textbook”, in which the very concepts of “Tatar-Mongol yoke” and “Tatar-Mongol invasion” are bashfully replaced by a harmless herbivorous “system of dependence of Russian lands on the Horde khans.” And this despite the fact that the phrase “Tatar yoke” first appeared in 1660 (in “The Tale of the Massacre of Mamaev”). However, ideological expediency once again prevailed over common sense and historical truth. I really don’t want the authorities and their Eurasian minions to admit that the Russians fought with the Tatars, who outnumbered the Russians, essentially one on one, without allies. So, apparently, they decided not to offend modern Tatars (descendants of the Volga Bulgars) and Central Asian guest workers. The Eurasians and Fomenko applaud. Finally, their phantasmagoria about the union of Rus' and the Horde, denial of the fact of the invasion and the subsequent Tatar-Mongol yoke were accepted as the official historical doctrine. As for the truth, they don't care.
Well. Let's return to reality, however. But the reality is this: in the last few years, several so-called sanitary burials from the times of Batu’s “Western” campaign against Rus' have been discovered, which colorfully demonstrate what kind of “union” it was. But first, for starters, a quote from Lev Nikolaevich Gumilyov (“What times are we living in”):

Uglich did not resist the Tatars. The entire population hid in the forest, with the exception of the merchants, who were sorry to abandon their property and who entered into an agreement with the Tatars to pay a small indemnity in horses and food in exchange for napaizu, a letter of safe conduct from the Tatars. So Uglich survived, and it was not the only one, Kostroma, Tver, Yaroslavl - all the cities along the Volga survived precisely because they made peace with the Tatars and Mongols.What a conquest! What kind of yoke is there -it wasn't there!
We will return to Yaroslavl later. So,

Vladimir

In the summer of 2011, employees of the Vladimir Regional Center for Archeology at VlSU conducted research at the construction site on the street. Zlatovratsky 1. For the first time, a mass burial of a large number of people, with a high degree of probability, died as a result of the siege of the city by the Mongol-Tatars in February 1238, was discovered.
The burial took place in a utility pit in the courtyard of an ancient Russian estate, which was burned during the capture of the city. This is evidenced by the large number of elements of burnt wooden structures and grain also found in this pit.
The total number of buried is at least 50 people. Of these, at least 36 are adults, aged 20-25 - 40-50 years. 13 - children and adolescents (28% of the total number of those buried), from newborns (up to 3 months) to children 11-12 years old.1 - teenager aged 12-15 years. Injuries in children are comparable in nature to those in adults, but the only type of injury is skull fractures. Almost all children's skulls are in a fragmented state.
The gender composition is noteworthy: the number of men is slightly larger (53%) than the number of women (47%), which indirectly confirms the absence of enemies in the burial, since it approximately corresponds to the usual proportion of the sexes of the Russian Gord. A special feature of this burial is the almost complete absence of elderly people, which distinguishes this burial from the so-called “paleontological” (mound) burials. Analysis of the data obtained allows us to conclude that in the presented sample the ratio of adult and child components was also quite typical for Vladimir at that time.

skull of a Slavic woman, 30-40 years old, overtaken and killed by a horseman from behind (chopped wound).

It should be noted that this burial is characterized by a very high percentage of injuries incompatible with life. The nature of the injuries allows us to unambiguously interpret them as resulting from an attack by a detachment of armed horsemen.
All injuries can be divided into 2 large groups: chopped and stabbed, caused by sharp objects, and fractures of the skull bones caused by a heavy blunt object. In men, chopped wounds predominate, in women and children, wounds with a heavy blunt object. The traumatic object was of small diameter (about 5-6 cm), but of great destructive power, apparently heavy, which caused a through fracture of the skull bones (presumably a mace or club).
The remains of a warrior of the Slavic anthropological type were discovered, who, in addition to a chopped blow (with a saber), which did not become fatal, had a non-fatal wound inflicted by a small pointed object (arrow), as well as a fatal fracture of the skull bones in the temporal region, the skull as a result of the blow was destroyed to eyeball (see photos above and below). The number and nature of the warrior’s injuries proves the desperate resilience, tenacity and heroism of the city’s defenders. The residents seemed to understand that they were doomed, but did not give up, saving their lives.

Many of those buried on the skulls had 2 injuries at once, each of which could be fatal. This situation is possible if “finishing off” the victim was practiced.
In children, the only type of injury in the Vladimir burial was fractures of the skull bones.

Thus, it is possible to reconstruct the tragic events, the consequence of which was the emergence of mass one-time burial for sanitary purposes. Obviously, there was an attack by a well-armed detachment of horsemen (the wounds were inflicted from above), whose task was the total extermination of the population.
All remains belong to the Slavic anthropological type, characteristic of the urban population of Vladimir.
Apparently, part of the burial was damaged and accidentally destroyed during the construction of a residential building in the 60s.
The Mongolian version of the attack is confirmed (among other things) by the finds of a large number of unique arrowheads (fork-arrows), used only by the steppe people. And also the appearance of signs of the presence of Tatars in a cultural layer later in chronology (see below, the estate on Gagarin Street)

Mongolian arrow "fork"

The city desperately resisted, but was doomed, since the main forces (the squad) were pulled together by Prince Yuri Vsevolodovich of Vladimir to the Sit River for the decisive battle, which took place on March 4, 1238 and was lost by the Russians.

Tatar presence in conquered lands (Vladimir)

In 2005, in Vladimir, in the area of ​​Gagarin Street, no. 2, the above group of Vladimir archaeologists discovered a burnt Tatar estate, indicating the presence of a rich Tatar family (apparently, a governor). The estate was built in the most “prestigious” area of ​​Vladimir for that time (the largest number of treasures were found in this area). According to archaeologists, this is a “Vladimir ruble coin from the 14th century.” Based on the nature of the finds, it can be said with a great degree of confidence that a Horde Tatar lived in the estate, since the items found were never used by the Russians and the Russians did not trade them. Items found include:
1) fragment of a glass goblet made in Syria (Aleppo, XIII-XIV centuries) in the Mamluk style

2) a fragment of a flask with an embossed ornament in the shape of a “kalype”, made in Khorezm ( XIV century ), common in Central Asia and Eastern countries

3) a bowl or dish made of “Jun-Yao” ceramics, China XII-XIII (the first finds of such dishes in Eastern Europe)

4) faience (Kashin ceramics with opaque glaze) of the “Minai” type (Iran, XIII-XIV century ) with Arabic script and semi-faience (Kashin ceramics with transparent glaze), produced in the Middle East(XIII-XIV century) , luster semi-faience with kashin painting(XIII-XIV century).

Kashin ceramics are a unique “marker” of the Horde (Tatar-Mongols), since it always accompanies their (and only their) presence. This type of ceramics was highly valued during the period under study in the Horde, and rich Tatars brought/took it with them throughout their entire migration and settlement.

Yaroslavl

Now let's return to Yaroslavl, in which, according to the Eurasianist L.N. Gumilyov there was neither yoke nor conquest

Expedition of the Institute of Archiology of the Russian Academy of Sciences under the leadership of A.V. Engovatova in 2004-2005 uncovered a number of sanitary burials in the historical center of Yaroslavl.In the study area (1200 sq.m.), 25 residential and utility buildings of varying degrees of preservation were identified, and more than a hundred utility and construction pits were recorded. A change in the layout and development of this quarter was revealed, as well as traces of powerful fires, including those mentioned in written sources in 1501 and 1658.
The first burial (a total of nine were discovered) was discovered under the foundation of the Assumption Cathedral in a structure of an earlier period, deepened into the mainland by 80-90 cm (presumably the basement of a residential building, photo above), a structure with wooden log walls. Judging by the chaotic arrangement of the skeletons of those buried (on their sides, on their backs, flat, some were thrown into the pit upside down), the burial was carried out hastily.

Animal bones were found among the human bones. Among the remains, women's jewelry, a cross-vest, pieces of fabric, virtual glass, fragments of plinth, and fragments of circular ceramics were also found. According to ceramics experts, the burial should be dated to the first half of the 13th century. In the first burial, the remains of 97 individuals of the Slavic (Vyatichi) anthropological type were discovered (the total number of skeletons found in 9 burials is about 500). The number of children in the group is approximately a third. The series under study was a one-time chronological section, which brought it closer to a traditional biological group (as opposed to paleoanthropological burials). Based on fragments of fabrics and other finds (wool, felt, fur), it can be said with a high degree of probability that people died in cold weather. Which corresponds to the dating of Batu’s invasion (winter 1247-48).
The second was a well in which the remains of at least 77 people were discovered. Based on the surviving wood of the well walls, it has been established that the well was erected no earlier than 1228. Among the things found were objects that had fallen into the well during its intended use (ladles, bowls, cups).

The dating of the archaeological material allows us to assert that all nine burials were made simultaneously - no earlier than the end of the 1220s and no later than the mid-13th century.
A study of Yaroslavl burials showed that closer to the city walls and defensive ramparts (near the borders of Detinets), the skeletons of middle-aged men 25-35 years old with fatal injuries in the facial part predominated.

Closer to the city center with a predominance of female and child skeletons (half as many men) with injuries to the back area, women of all ages. In the well where the soldiers were buried, the remains of (apparently) a militiaman were discovered - namely, in the well, a well-preserved insulated bast shoe with a winter insole was discovered, in which there were phalanges of the toes.

Pathologists believe that several months have passed from the moment of death to the moment of burial - fly larvae are present in the skulls, and the bodies are damaged by rodents. Apparently, the surviving residents hastily left the city, and the dead bodies remained unburied until June. This version is also supported by the fact that the remains (skeleton) of a cow with signs of dystrophic exhaustion and a rope around its neck were found in the well. People left the city and the tied cow died of hunger. Severed sheep heads were also found. Apparently, the Tatars cut off the heads of sheep and attached the headless carcasses to the saddle, moving further into the territory of Rus'.
Apparently the dead were buried in close proximity to the place where they died.
Among the causes of death, forensic experts from the Bureau of Forensic Medicine of the Moscow Department of Health, involved in the excavations, in almost all cases established death as a result of injuries incompatible with life. These include three characteristic groups:
1) chopped wounds
2) puncture wounds
3) perforated fractures (see photo)

a child's scapula bone pierced through (perforate fracture)

The injuries showed no signs of healing, meaning they were fatal. Damage to the children's skeletons led experts to the unequivocal conclusion that the children were not only killed, but also raised on spears (characteristic notches were found on the spine and chest). Women and children mostly died from arrow wounds in the chest, back and stomach. One child was found to have been wounded by a stele in the heel bone, which is only possible if the child was running away from someone who shot an arrow at him.
As a result, the city was set on fire and burned to the ground. Among the dead there are also those who were burned alive.

Old Ryazan, Izyaslavl, Kozelsk, Moscow, Kyiv

Similar burials were found:
- in Old Ryazan in the trenches of the eastern part of the Northern settlement (47 mass graves), discovered in 1926. There are traces of chopping weapons on the bones
- Fatyanovka village near Oka, 1979. Those killed with signs of violent death (skull fractures, arrowheads stuck in the bones) were placed in three tiers without coffins. Some signs indicated that frozen corpses were buried
- Izyaslavl (near the village of Gorodishche, Shepetovsky district, Khmelnitsky region) - more than 250 people (including women, old people and children) with injuries similar to Yaroslavl and Vladimir (that is, typical). Many of the corpses were heavily fragmented (chopped into pieces), with most injuries to the non-combatant population occurring from the sides, from behind, and while lying on the ground. Group M.K. Kargera
- Kyiv, 1892, burials near the Grand Ducal Court, Tithe Church, Golden Gate, Podol
- Kozelsk, Moscow - chronicles

This was such a wonderful union of Russians and Turks. Bravo, Eurasians!

Anthropology

Anthropological studies carried out in Yaroslavl, old Ryazan and Vladimir showed that all the dead belonged to the Slavic anthropological type from among the local residents. Interestingly, the settlement of North-Eastern Rus' by the Slavs was apparently carried out in two waves (Krivichi and Vyatichi). Because according to anthropological factors, the Slavs, the inhabitants of the village, differ from the Slavs, the inhabitants of the city. Moreover, city residents are anthropologically closer to Western Slavs, for example, Smolensk. This picture was not common in Rus', since the inhabitants of Kyiv and the lands adjacent to Kyiv, for example, belonged to the sameanthropologicaltipu - glades. Being in the zone of interethnic and intertribal contact with the Finno-Ugric peoples (Chud, Merya, Mordovians), the northeastern and eastern Slavs, however, are easily segmented and localized from the Finno-Ugric peoples, and even more so from the Mongoloids. The Finno-Ugric population of the region is distinguished by a narrow and relatively long cranium and a slightly protruding nose bridge, a higher flattening of the face at the level of the cheekbones in comparison with the Slavs, and a higher value of the bending index of the zygomatic bone.

In addition to the Slavs of two types and the Finno-Ugric peoples (also several types), Burtases (apparently) were present in small numbers in the region - a little studied ethnic group with weak Mongoloid features based on anthropological characteristics. However, among those killed in Vladimir and Yaroslavl there are no Finns or Mongoloids. At all. Firstly, this indicates that the cities were defended exclusively by Russians (Slavs) and only they lived in the cities. And secondly, that the Mongols immediately took the bodies of their dead fellow tribesmen and buried them somewhere else (at least their graves have not yet been found). However, based on the above reasons (the unconditional temporary presence of the Tatars in a later period), as well as according to numerous Russian, European, Persian, Arab, Chinese written sources and other material evidence that does not indicate any strife or other military campaigns, it can be unequivocally stated the reality of the invasion of the steppe people and their extreme cruelty towards the conquered population who offered resistance.

The article uses the following works:
"Archaeology of ancient Yaroslavl. Mysteries and discoveries" (Chapter 7) A.N. Buzhilova, N.N. Goncharova, M.V. Dobrovolskaya
"Mass medieval burial in Yaroslavl" A.V. Engolatova, D.O. Osipov, N.N. Goncharova, A.P. Buzhilova
"Anthropological study of the archaeological monument "Cultural layer, ramparts and ditches of ancient Vladimir of the XII-XVII centuries" (craniology, demography)" N.N. Goncharova
"New data on the problem of Slavic-Finnish interaction in the Upper Volga and Oka basin" D.S. Konopelkin
Special thanks for the material provided and comments:
Galchuk Larisa (head of)
Kabaev Danila Andreevich (leading archaeologist"Vladimir Regional Center for Archeology at Vladimir State University")
Natalia Nikolaevna Goncharova (PhD, Institute of Archeology RAS)

Glory to Ukraine! Glory to heroes!